Neoliberal Intergovernmentality and the Politicization of the EU: The Transformation of National Political Fields and the New Pro-Europeanisms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5477/cis/reis.183.3Keywords:
COVID-19, European Public Sphere, Europeanization, European Integration, Neoliberalism, European UnionAbstract
The 2010s, which began with the financial crisis, was followed by the refugee crisis and culminated with the coronavirus pandemic in 2020. These political crises have consolidated theoretical approaches to the European political field, conceived as much more than a mere diplomatic environment in which national governments negotiate common policies. The coronavirus crisis, however, resulted in a faster, more decisive response than the previous two crises, mobilizing an unprecedented number of resources and building new consensuses at a previously unforeseen rate. This article uses a political sociology
perspective to examine the European response to several recent internal and external crises, revealing a transformation in the way in which politics operates that we conceive as “intergovernmentality”, a process that is compatible with the transformation of national political fields through the politicization of the EU.
Downloads
References
Alemanno, Alberto (2012). Regulating the European Risk Society. En: A. Alemanno; F. Den Butter; A. Nijsen y J. Torriti (eds.). Better Business Regula- tion in a Risk Society. New York: Springer.
Aro, Jari y Heiskala, Risto (2018). A Promoter of Values or a Shopkeepers’ Empire? Economy and Soci- ety in the Europe 2020 Strategy and the Trade Pol- icy of the EU. En: J. Aro y R. Heiskala (eds.). Policy Design in the European Union: An Empire of Shop- keepers in the Making? London: Palgrave Macmil- lan.
Apeldoorn, Bastiaan van; Drahokoupil, Jan y Horn, Laura (eds.) (2008). Contradictions and Limits of Neoliberal European Governance. London: Pal- grave Macmillan.
Beauvallet, Willy y Michon, Sébastien (2012). Faire carrière au Parlement européen. Activation de dis- positions et socialisation institutionnelle. En: D. Georgakakis (ed.). Le champ de l'Eurocratie: une sociologie politique du personnel de l’UE. Paris: Economica.
Beck, Ulrich (1998). La sociedad del riesgo: hacia una nueva modernidad. Barcelona: Paidós.
Bhambra, Gurminder K. (2022). «A Decolonial Pro- ject for Europe». Journal of Common Market Stu- dies, 60(2): 229-244.
Bickerton, Chris (2012). European Integration. From Nation-States to Member States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bickerton, Chris (2015). A Union of Member States. En: C. Bickerton; D. Hodson y U. Puetter (eds.). The New Intergovernmentalism: States and Supra- national Actors in the Post-Maastricht Era. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bickerton, Chris; Hodson, Dermot y Puetter, Uwe (2015). «The New Intergovernmentalism: European Integration in the Post-Maastricht Era». Journal of Common Market Studies, 53(4): 703-722.
Bourdieu, Pierre (1997). «De la maison du roi à la rai- son d’État, un modèle de la genèse du champ bu- reaucratique». Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales, 118(1): 55-68.
Bouza García, Luis (2017). «The “New Narrative Pro- ject” and the Politicisation of the EU». Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 25(3): 340-353.
Bouza García, Luis y Oleart, Álvaro (2018). «From the 2005 Constitution’s “Permissive Consensus” To TTIP’s “Empowering Dissensus”: The EU as a Playing Field for Spanish Civil Society». Journal of Contemporary European Research, 14(2): 87-104.
Bouza García, Luis y Oleart, Álvaro (2022). Make Eu- rope Great Again: The Politicising Pro-European Narrative of Emmanuel Macron in France. En: T. Haapala and A. Oleart (eds.). Tracing the Politici- sation of the EU, (pp. 271-293). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Braun, Elisa y Momtaz, Rym (2021). «Use of Consul- tancies for Vaccine Rollout Sparks Controversy in France». Politico, 6 de enero. Disponible en: https://www.politico.eu/article/french-govern- ment-defends-mckinsey-coronavirus-vaccine-rol- lout/
Buth, Vanessa (2011). «Professionalization of Groups- friend or Foe of Grassroots Representation». ECPR’s 6th General Conference, Reykjavik, Islan- dia, 25-27 de agosto de 2011.
Cohen, Antonin (2010). «Dix personnages majestueux en longue robe amarante». Revue Française de Science Politique, 60(2): 227-246.
Chopin, Thierry (2015). La fracture poliltique de l'Europe: Crise de légitimité et déficit politique. Bruxelles: Éditions Larcier.
Crespy, Amandine y Verschueren, Nicolas (2009).
«From Euroscepticism to Resistance to European Integration: An Interdisciplinary Perspective». Pers- pectives on European Politics and Society, 10(3): 377-393.
Crum, Ben y Oleart, Álvaro (eds.) (2023). Populist Par- ties and Democratic Resilience. London: Routledge.
Delanty, Gerard (2013). Formations of European Mo- dernity: A Historical and Political Sociology of Eu- rope. London: Springer.
De Wilde, Pieter (2019). «Media Logic and Grand Theories of European Integration». Journal of Eu- ropean Public Policy, 26(8): 1193-1212. doi: 10.1 080/13501763.2019.1622590
De Wilde, Pieter; Leupold, Anna y Schmidtke, Hen- ning (2016). «Introduction: The Differentiated Po- liticisation of European Governance». West Euro- pean Politics, 39(1): 3-22. doi: 10.1080/01402382 .2015.1081505
Díez Medrano, Juan (2003). Framing Europe: Attitudes to European Integration in Germany, Spain and the United Kingdom. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Fligstein, Neil (2008). Euroclash: The EU, European Identity, and the Future of Europe. Oxford: Ox- ford University Press.
Fligstein, Neil y McAdam, Doug (2012). A Theory of Fields. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fossum, John E. y Schlesinger, Philip (eds.) (2007). The European Union and the Public Sphere: A Communicative Space in the Making? London: Routledge.
Foucault, Michel (2009). Nacimiento de la biopolí- tica: curso del Collège de France (1978-1979) (Vol. 283). Madrid: Ediciones Akal.
Fraser, Nancy (2003). «From Discipline to Flexibiliza- tion? Rereading Foucault in the Shadow of Glo- balization». Constellations, 10(2): 160-171.
Georgakakis, Didier (1999). Les réalités d’un mythe : figure de l’eurocrate et institutionnalisation de
l’Europe politique. En: D. Dulong y V. Dubois (eds.). La question technocratique. Estrasburgo: Presses Universitaires de Strasbourg.
Georgakakis, Didier (ed.) (2004). Les métiers de l’Europe politique. Acteurs et professionnalisa- tions de la construction européenne. Estras- burgo: Presses Universitaires de Strasbourg.
Georgakakis, Didier (2008). «La sociologie historique et politique de l'Union européenne: un point de vue d'ensemble et quelques contre points». Poli- tique Européenne, 2: 53-85.
Georgakakis, Didier (dir.) (2012). Le champ de l'eu- rocratie: une sociologie politique du personnel de l’UE. Paris: Economica.
Georgakakis, Didier (2017). European Civil Service in (Times of) Crisis A Political Sociology of the Changing Power of Eurocrats. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Georgakakis, Didier (2018). European Integration. En: W. Outwaithe y S. Turner (ed.). The SAGE Handbook of Political Sociology (pp. 1083-1103). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Georgakakis, Didier y Rowell, Jay (eds.) (2013). The Field of Eurocracy: Mapping EU Actors and Pro- fessionals. London: Springer.
Georgakakis, Didier y Vauchez, Antoine (2015). Le concept de champ à l’épreuve de l’Europe. En: Enquêtes globales en sciences sociales, (pp. 197-220). Paris: CNRS.
Gerbaudo, Paolo (2021). The Great Recoil: Politics af- ter Populism and Pandemic. London: Verso Books.
Guiraudon, Virginie; Ruzza, Carlo y Trenz, Hans- Jörg (eds.) (2016). Europe’s Prolonged Crisis: The Making or the Unmaking of a Political Union. Lon- don: Springer.
Haahr, Jens H. y Walters, William (2004). Governing Europe: Discourse, Governmentality and Euro- pean Integration. London: Routledge.
Haapala, Taru y Oleart, Álvaro (eds.) (2022). Tracing the Politicisation of the EU. London: Palgrave Mac- millan.
Hooghe, Liesbet y Marks, Gary (2009). «A Postfunc- tionalist Theory of European Integration: From Per- missive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus». British Journal of Political Science, 39(01): 1-23.
Iglesias, Pablo; Catalfo, Nunzia y Mendes Godinho, Ana (2020). «Hacia un ingreso mí- nimo europeo». La Vanguardia, 8 de mayo. Dis- ponible en: https://www.lavanguardia.com/ economia/20200508/481016963163/hacia-un-in- greso-minimo-europeo.html
Kauppi, Niilo (2018). Toward a Reflexive Political So- ciology of the European Union. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Keskinen, Suvi; Norocel, Ov C. y Jørgensen, Martin B. (2016). «The Politics and Policies of Welfare Chau- vinism under the Economic Crisis». Critical Social Policy, 36(3): 321-329.
Kitschelt, Herbert (2004). «Diversificación y recon- figuración de los sistemas de partidos de las de- mocracias postindustriales». Revista Española de Ciencia Política, 10: 9-51.
Kohler-Koch, Beate y Quittkat, Christine (2013). De-mystification of Participatory Democracy: EU-governance and Civil Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kriesi, Hanspeter (2016). «The politicization of Eu- ropean integration», JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 54: 32-47.
Kriesi, Hanspeter; Grande, Edgar; Lachat, Romain; Dolezal, Martin; Bornschier, Simon y Frey, Timotheos (2006). «Globalization and the Trans- formation of the National Political Space: Six Eu- ropean Countries Compared». European Jour- nal of Political Research, 45(6): 921-956. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00644.x
Kriesi, Hanspeter; Grande, Edgar; Dolezal, Martin; Helbling, Marc; Höglinger, Dominic; Hutter, Swen y Wüest, Bruno (2012). Political Conflict in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kutay, Acar (2021). NGOs, Civil Society and Struc- tural Changes. Springer Nature.
Larner, Wendy y Walters, William (eds.) (2004). Global Governmentality: Governing International Spaces. Abington: Routledge.
Lipschutz, Ronnie (2005). Global Civil Society and Global Governmentality: or, the Search for Poli- tics and the State Amidst the Capillaries of Social Power. En: M. Barnett y R. Duvall (eds.). Power in global governance. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni- versity Press.
Lo Schiavo, Lidia (2014). «Governance, Civil Society, Governmentality. The “Foucauldian Moment” in the Globalization Debate: Theoretical Perspec- tives». International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 4(13): 181-197.
Ludlow, Piers (2009). The European Commission and the Rise of Coreper: A Controlled Experi- ment. En: W. Kaiser; B. Leucht y M. Rasmussen (eds.). The History of the European Union. Origins of a Trans- and Supranational Polity 1950-72. London: Routledge.
Middelaar, Luuk van (2018). Quand l'Europe impro- vise. Dix ans de crises politiques. Editions Galli- mard. Paris: Gallimard.
Mitchell, Katharyne (2006). «Neoliberal Governmen- tality in the European Union: Education, Training, and Technologies of Citizenship». Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 24(3): 389- 407. doi: 10.1068/d1804
Moreno, Luis (2014). Europa sin estados: unión po- lítica en el (des) orden global. Madrid: Los Libros de la Catarata.
Oleart, Álvaro (2021). Framing TTIP in the European Public Spheres. London: Springer.
Oleart, Álvaro y Bouza, Luis (2018a). «Democracy at Stake: Multipositional Actors and Politicization in the EU Civil Society Field». Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(4): 870-887. doi: 10.1111/ jcms.12687
Oleart, Álvaro y Bouza, Luis (2018b). Overcoming the Taboo: Disputes over European Values Via the European Citizens’ Initiative. En: F. Foret y
O. Calligaro (eds.). European Values: Challenges and Opportunities for EU Governance. New York: Routledge.
Oleart, Álvaro y Gheyle, Niels (2022). «Executive Gladiators in the European Arena: Discursive In- tergovernmentalism in the Politicization of the Covid-19 EU Recovery Plan». Journal of Euro- pean Integration, 44(8): 1095-1111. doi: 10.1080/
2022.2085695
Outhwaite, William (2008). European Society. Cam- bridge: Polity.
Sandbu, Martin (2020). «EU Crosses the Rubicon with its Emergency Recovery Fund». Financial Times, 22 de julio. Disponible en: https://www.ft.com/content/ bd570dde-3095-4074-bd37-18003f2bd3c2
Schmidt, Vivien A. (2006). Democracy in Europe: The EU and National Polities. Oxford: Oxford Uni- versity Press.
Torreblanca, José I. (2014). ¿Quién gobierna en Eu- ropa? Reconstruir la democracia, recuperar la ciu- dadanía. Madrid: Catarata y Fundación Alternativas.
Trenz, Hans-Jörg (2009). Social Theory and Euro- pean Integration. En: A. Favell y V. Guiraudon. Sociology of the European Union. London: Pal- grave Macmillan.
Trenz, Hans-Jörg (2016). Narrating European Society: Toward a Sociology of European Integration. Lon- don: Palgrave Macmillan.
Trenz, Hans-Jörg and De Wilde, Pieter (2009). «De- nouncing European Integration: Euroscepti- cism as Reactive Identity Formation». RECON Online Working Paper, no. 10, ARENA, Uni- versity of Oslo. Disponible en: http://www. reconproject.eu/main.php/RECON_wp_0910.pd- f?fileitem=16662597
Vauchez, Antoine (2008). «The Force of a Weak Field: Law and Lawyers in the Government of the European Union (for a Renewed Research Agenda)». International Political Sociology, 2(2): 128-144. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-5687.2008.00040.x
Vauchez, Antoine y France, Pierre (2021). The Neo- liberal Republic: Corporate Lawyers, Statecraft, and the Making of Public-Private France. New York: Cornell University Press.
Vidal, Guillem (2018). «Challenging Business as Usual? The Rise of New Parties in Spain in Times of Crisis». West European Politics, 41(2): 261- 286.
Zielonka, Jan (2007). Europe as Empire: The Nature of the Enlarged European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 REIS. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Permite Compartir — copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato, Adaptar — remezclar, transformar y construir a partir del material para cualquier propósito, incluso comercialmente.
