Influencia de las notificaciones (previas a la entrevista) en la tasa de respuesta en encuestas telefónicas

Autores/as

  • Vidal Díaz de Rada Universidad Pública de Navarra
  • Ana Díaz de Rada Universidad Pública de Navarra

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5477/cis/reis.195.143-154

Palabras clave:

Encuesta telefónica , Metaanálisis, Notificación previa, Tasa de cooperación, Tasa de respuesta

Resumen

En un contexto de descenso de las tasas de respuesta de las encuestas, aumentar la colaboración de las personas seleccionadas para ser encuestadas es uno de los grandes desafíos. Este artículo se centra en la eficacia del contacto previo a la entrevista como estrategia para aumentar la colaboración en encuestas telefónicas. Para ello, lleva a cabo un análisis exhaustivo de las investigaciones publicadas en cinco bases de datos que recogen trabajos sociológicos, cuyos hallazgos son analizados con la técnica del metaanálisis. Los resultados desvelan que la utilización de notificaciones consigue un aumento de la tasa de cooperación en las encuestas telefónicas con un tamaño de efecto de 1,24, que se incrementa en las encuestas realizadas a teléfonos móviles.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR) (2023). Standard Definitions. Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys. Disponible en: https://aapor.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Standards-Definitions-10th-edition.pdf, consulta

Aizpurua, Eva; Park, Ki H.; Avery, Mitchell; Wittrock, Jill; Muilenburg, Rodney y Losch, Mary E. (2018). «The Impact of Advance Letters on Cellphone Response in a Statewide Dual-Frame Survey». Survey Practice, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.29115/SP-2018-0011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29115/SP-2018-0011

Badoe, Daniel A. y Biney, Ángela (2017). «Receipt of Travel Survey Advance Letter and Its Impact on Reported Trips and Number of Phone Calls for Survey Completion in Telephone Surveys». Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 143(2). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000370 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000370

Beullens, Koen; Loosveldt, Geert; Vandenplas, Caroline y Stoop, Ineke (2018). «Response Rates in the European Social Survey: Increasing, Decreasing, or a Matter of Fieldwork Efforts?». Survey Methods: Insights from the Field, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.13094/SMIF-2018-00003

Botella Ausina, Juan y Sánchez Meca, Julio (2015). Meta-análisis en ciencias sociales y de la salud. Madrid: Síntesis.

Botella Ausina, Juan y Zamora, Ángela (2017). «El meta-análisis: una metodología para la investigación en educación». Educación XX1, 20(2): 17-38. https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.19030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.19030

Brenner, Phillip S. y Buskirk, Trent D. (2022). «Scratch the Scratch-off: Testing Prepaid and Conditional Incentives with Postcard and Letter Invitations». Field Methods, 34(1): 20-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X211069640 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X211069640

Capistrano, Daniel y Creighton, Mathew (2022). «The effect of advance letters on survey participation». Survey Methods: Insights from the Field. https://doi.org/10.13094/SMIF-2022-00002

Carey, Renee N.; Reid, Allison; Driscoll, Timothy R.; Glass, Deborah C.; Benke, Geza y Fritschi, Lin (2013). «An advance letter did not increase the response rates in a telephone survey». Journal Of Clinical Epidemiology, 66(12): 1417-1421. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.03.007

Conrad, Frederic; Broome, Jessica S.; Benkí José R.; Kreuter, Frauke; Groves, Robert M.; Vannette, David y McClain, Colleen (2013). «Interviewer speech and the success of survey invitations». Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 176: 191-210. https://doi.org/10.2307/23355183 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2012.01064.x

Couper, Mick P. (2017). «New Developments in Survey Data Collection». Annual Review of Sociology, 43: 21-45.

Dal Grande, Eleonora; Chittleborough, Catherine R.; Campostrini, Stefano; Dollard, Maureen y Winifred Taylor, Anne (2016). «Pre-survey text messages (SMS) improve participation rate in an Australian mobile telephone survey: An experimental study». PLoS ONE 11(2): e0150231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150231

Dillman, Don A. (2017). «The promise and challenge of pushing respondents to the Web in mixed-mode surveys». Survey Methodology, 43: 3-30.

Dillman, Don A.; Groves, Robert M.; Eltinge, John L. y Little, Roderick J.A. (2002). Survey nonresponse. New York: Willey.

Frey, James H. (1983). Survey Research by Telephone. London: Sage.

Greenberg, Pierce y Dillman, Don (2021). «Mail communications and survey response». Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, 11: 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smab020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smab020

Harrison, Siân; Henderson, Jane; Alderdice, Fiona y Quigley, Maria A. (2019). «Methods to increase response rates to a population-based maternity survey: a comparison of two pilot studies». BMC Medical Research Methodology, 19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0702-3

Higgins, Julian P. T.; Thompson, Simon G.; Deeks, Jonathan J. y Altman, Douglas G. (2003). «Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses». British Medical Journal, 327: 557-560. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557

Huedo-Medina, Tania B.; Sánchez-Meca, Julio; Marín-Martínez, Fulgencio y Botella, Juan (2006). «Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index?». Psychol Methods, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.11.2.193 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.11.2.193

Instituto Nacional de Estadística (INE) (2024). Encuesta sobre equipamiento y uso de tecnologías de la información y comunicación en los hogares 2024. Madrid: INE.

Kennedy, Courtney y Hartig, Hannah (2019). Response rates in telephone surveys have resumed their decline. Pew Research Center. Disponible en: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/02/27/response-rates-in-telephone-surveys-have-resumed-their-decline/, acceso 23 de enero 2026.

Kennedy, Courtney; Popky, Dana y Keeter, Scott (2023). How public polling has changed in the 21st century. Pew Research Center. Disponible en: www.pewresearch.org/methods/2023/04/19/how-public-polling-has-changed-in-the-21st-century/, acceso 23 de enero 2026.

Kocar, Sebastian (2022). «Survey Response in RDD-Sampling SMS-Invitation Web-Push Study». Survey Research Methods, 16(3): 283-299. https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2022.v16i3.7846

Lavrakas, Paul; Benson, Grant; Blumberg, Stephen; Buskirk, Trent; Flores Cervantes, Ismael; Christian, Leah; Dutwin, David; Fahimi, Mansour; Fienberg, Howard; Guterbock, Tom; Keeter, Scott; Kelly, Jenny; Kennedy, Courtney; Peytchev, Andy; Piekarski, Linda y Shuttles, Chuck (2017). «The future of U.S. general population telephone survey research». AAPOR Task Force. Disponible en: https:// aapor.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Future-of-Telephone-Survey-Research-Report.pdf, acceso 23 de enero 2026.

Leeuw, Edith de; Callegaro, Mario; Hox, Joop y Korendijk, Elly (2007). «The influence of advanced letters on response in telephone surveys: a meta-analysis». Public Opinion Quartely, 71: 413-443. https://ddoi.org/10.1093/poq/nfm014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfm014

Leeuw, Edith de y Hox, Joop (2015). Survey mode and mode effects. En: Engel, U.; Jann, Ben; Lynn, Peter; Scherpenzeel, Annette y Sturgis, Patrick (eds.). Improving survey methods, (pp. 25-45). London: Routledge.

Lepkowski, James M.; Tucker, Clyde; Brick, J. Michael; Leeuw, Edith D. de; Japec, Lilli; Lavrakas, Paul J.; Link, Michael W. y Sangster, Roberta L. (2008). Advances in telephone survey methodology. New York: Wiley. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470173404

Lippe, Elena von der; Schmich, Patrick y Lange, Cornelia (2011). «Advance letters as a way of reducing non-response in a National Health Telephone Survey». Survey Research Methods, 5(3): 103-116. Disponible en: http://www.surveymethods.org, acceso 23 de enero 2026.

Luiten, Annemieke; Hox, Joop y Leeuw, Edith de (2020). «Survey Nonresponse Trends and Fieldwork». Journal of Official Statistics, 36(3): 469-487. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2020-0025

Lyberg, Lars y Kasprzyk, David (1991). Data collection methods and Measurement Errors. En: Biemer, P. P.; Groves, R. M.; Lyberg, L. E.; Mathiowetz, N. A. y Sudman, S. (eds.). Measurement Errors in Surveys (pp. 235-257). New York: Wiley. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118150382.ch13

Lynn, Peter y Taylor, Sol (1998). «The Effect of Preliminary Notification Letter on Response to a Postal Survey». International Journal of Market Research, 40(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/147078539804000204 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/147078539804000204

Massey, James T. (1988). An overview of telephone coverage. En: R.M. Groves et al. (eds.). Telephone Survey Methodology (pp. 3-8). New York: Wiley.

Massey, Douglas y Tourangeau, Roger (2013). «Introduction: new challenges to social measurement». The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 645: 6-22. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23479079 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716212463314

Nathan, Gad (2001). «Telesurvey Methodologies for Household Surveys – A Review and Some Thoughts for the Future». Survey Methodology, 27: 7-31.

Olson, Kristen; Smyth, Jolene D.; Horwitz, Rachel; Keeter, Scott; Lesser, Virginia; Marken, Stephanie; Mathiowetz, Nancy A.; McCarthy, Jaki S.; O’Brien, Eileen; Opsomer, Jean D.; Steiger, Darby; Sterrett, David; Su, Jennifer; Suzer-Gurtekin, Z. Tuba; Turakhia, Chintan y Wagner, James (2021). «Transitions from Telephone Surveys to Self-Administered and Mixed-Mode Surveys: AAPOR Task Force Report». Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, 9(3): 381-411. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smz062

Presser, Stanley y McCulloch, Susan (2011). «The Growth of Survey Research in the United States: Government-Sponsored Surveys 1984–2004». Social Science Research, 40: 1019-1024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2011.04.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2011.04.004

Schell, Christina; Godinho, Alexandra; Kushnir, Vladyslav y Cunningham, John A. (2018). «To send or not to send: weighing the costs and benefits of mailing an advance letter to participants before a telephone survey». BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11(1): 813. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-018-3920-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-018-3920-6

Skalland, Benjamin; Zhao, Zhen y Jeyarajah, Jenny (2015). «The Effectiveness of Advance Letters for Cell Telephone Samples». Proceedings. American Statistical Association. Annual Meeting, 20 (mayo 15-18-2014).

Sterne, Jonathan A. C.; Gabaghan, David y Edger, Matthhias (2000). «Publication and related bias in meta-analysis: power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literature». Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 53: 1119-1129. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-4356(00)00242-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(00)00242-0

Stoop, Ineke; Billiet, Jaak; Koch, Achim y Fitzgerald, Rory (2010). Improving survey response: lessons learned from the European Social Survey. London: Wiley. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470688335

Vicente, Paula y Marques, Catarina (2017). «Do Initial Respondents Differ From Callback Respondents? Lessons From a Mobile CATI Survey». Social Sciences Computer Review, 35: 606-618. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439316655975 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439316655975

Vogl, Susanne (2018). «Advance letters in a telephone survey on domestic violence Letters in Surveys». International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 31(2): 243-265. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edy006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edy006

Woolf, Benjamin y Edwards, Phil (2021). «Does advance contact with research participants increase response to questionnaires: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis». BMC Medical Research methodology, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01435-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01435-2

Publicado

2026-07-02

Cómo citar

Díaz de Rada, V., & Díaz de Rada, A. (2026). Influencia de las notificaciones (previas a la entrevista) en la tasa de respuesta en encuestas telefónicas. Revista Española De Investigaciones Sociológicas, (195), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.5477/cis/reis.195.143-154

Número

Sección

Notas de Investigación