Forthcoming

INFLUENCE OF (PRE-INTERVIEW) NOTIFICATION ON RESPONSE RATES IN TELEPHONE SURVEYS

Authors

  • Vidal Díaz de Rada Universidad Pública de Navarra
  • Ana Díaz de Rada Universidad Pública de Navarra

Keywords:

Telephone Survey, Meta-analysis, Pre-notification, Cooperation Rate, Response Rate

Abstract

One of the great challenges faced in a context of declining survey response rates is to increase the cooperation of the people selected to be surveyed. This article focuses on the effectiveness of a pre-interview contact as a strategy to increase telephone survey cooperation rates. To this end, an exhaustive analysis was conducted of the research published in five databases that collect sociological works, the findings of which were examined using the meta-analysis technique. The results revealed that the use of notifications increases cooperation rates in telephone surveys with an effect size of 1.24, which increases in surveys carried out on mobile phones.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR) (2023). Standard Definitions. Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys. Disponible en: https://aapor.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Standards-Definitions-10th-edition.pdf, consulta

Aizpurua, Eva; Park, Ki H.; Avery, Mitchell; Wittrock, Jill; Muilenburg, Rodney y Losch, Mary E. (2018). «The Impact of Advance Letters on Cellphone Response in a Statewide Dual-Frame Survey». Survey Practice, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.29115/SP-2018-0011

Badoe, Daniel A. y Biney, Ángela (2017). «Receipt of Travel Survey Advance Letter and Its Impact on Reported Trips and Number of Phone Calls for Survey Completion in Telephone Surveys». Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 143(2). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000370

Beullens, Koen; Loosveldt, Geert; Vandenplas, Caroline y Stoop, Ineke (2018). «Response Rates in the European Social Survey: Increasing, Decreasing, or a Matter of Fieldwork Efforts?». Survey Methods: Insights from the Field, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.13094/SMIF-2018-00003

Botella Ausina, Juan y Sánchez Meca, Julio (2015). Meta-análisis en ciencias sociales y de la salud. Madrid: Síntesis.

Botella Ausina, Juan y Zamora, Ángela (2017). «El meta-análisis: una metodología para la investigación en educación». Educación XX1, 20(2): 17-38. https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.19030

Brenner, Phillip S. y Buskirk, Trent D. (2022). «Scratch the Scratch-off: Testing Prepaid and Conditional Incentives with Postcard and Letter Invitations». Field Methods, 34(1): 20-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X211069640

Capistrano, Daniel y Creighton, Mathew (2022). «The effect of advance letters on survey participation». Survey Methods: Insights from the Field. https://doi.org/10.13094/SMIF-2022-00002

Carey, Renee N.; Reid, Allison; Driscoll, Timothy R.; Glass, Deborah C.; Benke, Geza y Fritschi, Lin (2013). «An advance letter did not increase the response rates in a telephone survey». Journal Of Clinical Epidemiology, 66(12): 1417-1421.

Conrad, Frederic; Broome, Jessica S.; Benkí José R.; Kreuter, Frauke; Groves, Robert M.; Vannette, David y McClain, Colleen (2013). «Interviewer speech and the success of survey invitations». Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 176: 191-210. https://doi.org/10.2307/23355183

Couper, Mick P. (2017). «New Developments in Survey Data Collection». Annual Review of Sociology, 43: 21-45.

Dal Grande, Eleonora; Chittleborough, Catherine R.; Campostrini, Stefano; Dollard, Maureen y Winifred Taylor, Anne (2016). «Pre-survey text messages (SMS) improve participation rate in an Australian mobile telephone survey: An experimental study». PLoS ONE 11(2): e0150231.

Dillman, Don A. (2017). «The promise and challenge of pushing respondents to the Web in mixed-mode surveys». Survey Methodology, 43: 3-30.

Dillman, Don A.; Groves, Robert M.; Eltinge, John L. y Little, Roderick J.A. (2002). Survey nonresponse. New York: Willey.

Frey, James H. (1983). Survey Research by Telephone. London: Sage.

Greenberg, Pierce y Dillman, Don (2021). «Mail communications and survey response». Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, 11: 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smab020

Harrison, Siân; Henderson, Jane; Alderdice, Fiona y Quigley, Maria A. (2019). «Methods to increase response rates to a population-based maternity survey: a comparison of two pilot studies». BMC Medical Research Methodology, 19.

Higgins, Julian P. T.; Thompson, Simon G.; Deeks, Jonathan J. y Altman, Douglas G. (2003). «Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses». British Medical Journal, 327: 557-560. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557

Huedo-Medina, Tania B.; Sánchez-Meca, Julio; Marín-Martínez, Fulgencio y Botella, Juan (2006). «Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index?». Psychol Methods, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.11.2.193

Instituto Nacional de Estadística (INE) (2024). Encuesta sobre equipamiento y uso de tecnologías de la información y comunicación en los hogares 2024. Madrid: INE.

Kennedy, Courtney y Hartig, Hannah (2019). Response rates in telephone surveys have resumed their decline. Pew Research Center. Disponible en: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/02/27/response-rates-in-telephone-surveys-have-resumed-their-decline/, acceso 23 de enero 2026.

Kennedy, Courtney; Popky, Dana y Keeter, Scott (2023). How public polling has changed in the 21st century. Pew Research Center. Disponible en: www.pewresearch.org/methods/2023/04/19/how-public-polling-has-changed-in-the-21st-century/, acceso 23 de enero 2026.

Kocar, Sebastian (2022). «Survey Response in RDD-Sampling SMS-Invitation Web-Push Study». Survey Research Methods, 16(3): 283-299. https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2022.v16i3.7846

Lavrakas, Paul; Benson, Grant; Blumberg, Stephen; Buskirk, Trent; Flores Cervantes, Ismael; Christian, Leah; Dutwin, David; Fahimi, Mansour; Fienberg, Howard; Guterbock, Tom; Keeter, Scott; Kelly, Jenny; Kennedy, Courtney; Peytchev, Andy; Piekarski, Linda y Shuttles, Chuck (2017). «The future of U.S. general population telephone survey research». AAPOR Task Force. Disponible en: https:// aapor.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Future-of-Telephone-Survey-Research-Report.pdf, acceso 23 de enero 2026.

Leeuw, Edith de; Callegaro, Mario; Hox, Joop y Korendijk, Elly (2007). «The influence of advanced letters on response in telephone surveys: a meta-analysis». Public Opinion Quartely, 71: 413-443. https://ddoi.org/10.1093/poq/nfm014

Leeuw, Edith de y Hox, Joop (2015). Survey mode and mode effects. En: Engel, U.; Jann, Ben; Lynn, Peter; Scherpenzeel, Annette y Sturgis, Patrick (eds.). Improving survey methods, (pp. 25-45). London: Routledge.

Lepkowski, James M.; Tucker, Clyde; Brick, J. Michael; Leeuw, Edith D. de; Japec, Lilli; Lavrakas, Paul J.; Link, Michael W. y Sangster, Roberta L. (2008). Advances in telephone survey methodology. New York: Wiley.

Lippe, Elena von der; Schmich, Patrick y Lange, Cornelia (2011). «Advance letters as a way of reducing non-response in a National Health Telephone Survey». Survey Research Methods, 5(3): 103-116. Disponible en: http://www.surveymethods.org, acceso 23 de enero 2026.

Luiten, Annemieke; Hox, Joop y Leeuw, Edith de (2020). «Survey Nonresponse Trends and Fieldwork». Journal of Official Statistics, 36(3): 469-487.

Lyberg, Lars y Kasprzyk, David (1991). Data collection methods and Measurement Errors. En: Biemer, P. P.; Groves, R. M.; Lyberg, L. E.; Mathiowetz, N. A. y Sudman, S. (eds.). Measurement Errors in Surveys (pp. 235-257). New York: Wiley.

Lynn, Peter y Taylor, Sol (1998). «The Effect of Preliminary Notification Letter on Response to a Postal Survey». International Journal of Market Research, 40(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/147078539804000204

Massey, James T. (1988). An overview of telephone coverage. En: R.M. Groves et al. (eds.). Telephone Survey Methodology (pp. 3-8). New York: Wiley.

Massey, Douglas y Tourangeau, Roger (2013). «Introduction: new challenges to social measurement». The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 645: 6-22. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23479079

Nathan, Gad (2001). «Telesurvey Methodologies for Household Surveys – A Review and Some Thoughts for the Future». Survey Methodology, 27: 7-31.

Olson, Kristen; Smyth, Jolene D.; Horwitz, Rachel; Keeter, Scott; Lesser, Virginia; Marken, Stephanie; Mathiowetz, Nancy A.; McCarthy, Jaki S.; O’Brien, Eileen; Opsomer, Jean D.; Steiger, Darby; Sterrett, David; Su, Jennifer; Suzer-Gurtekin, Z. Tuba; Turakhia, Chintan y Wagner, James (2021). «Transitions from Telephone Surveys to Self-Administered and Mixed-Mode Surveys: AAPOR Task Force Report». Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, 9(3): 381-411.

Presser, Stanley y McCulloch, Susan (2011). «The Growth of Survey Research in the United States: Government-Sponsored Surveys 1984–2004». Social Science Research, 40: 1019-1024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2011.04.004

Schell, Christina; Godinho, Alexandra; Kushnir, Vladyslav y Cunningham, John A. (2018). «To send or not to send: weighing the costs and benefits of mailing an advance letter to participants before a telephone survey». BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11(1): 813. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-018-3920-6

Skalland, Benjamin; Zhao, Zhen y Jeyarajah, Jenny (2015). «The Effectiveness of Advance Letters for Cell Telephone Samples». Proceedings. American Statistical Association. Annual Meeting, 20 (mayo 15-18-2014).

Sterne, Jonathan A. C.; Gabaghan, David y Edger, Matthhias (2000). «Publication and related bias in meta-analysis: power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literature». Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 53: 1119-1129. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-4356(00)00242-0

Stoop, Ineke; Billiet, Jaak; Koch, Achim y Fitzgerald, Rory (2010). Improving survey response: lessons learned from the European Social Survey. London: Wiley.

Vicente, Paula y Marques, Catarina (2017). «Do Initial Respondents Differ From Callback Respondents? Lessons From a Mobile CATI Survey». Social Sciences Computer Review, 35: 606-618. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439316655975

Vogl, Susanne (2018). «Advance letters in a telephone survey on domestic violence Letters in Surveys». International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 31(2): 243-265. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edy006

Woolf, Benjamin y Edwards, Phil (2021). «Does advance contact with research participants increase response to questionnaires: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis». BMC Medical Research methodology, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01435-2

Published

2026-05-26

How to Cite

Díaz de Rada, V., & Díaz de Rada, A. (2026). INFLUENCE OF (PRE-INTERVIEW) NOTIFICATION ON RESPONSE RATES IN TELEPHONE SURVEYS. Revista Española De Investigaciones Sociológicas, 153–164. Retrieved from https://reis.cis.es/index.php/reis/article/view/2494

Issue

Section

Notas de Investigación